King james bible verses about homosexuality

What the New Testament Says about Homosexuality

The Fourth R Volume May-June

Mainline Christian denominations in this state are bitterly divided over the question of homosexuality. For this reason it is important to question what light, if any, the New Testament sheds on this controversial issue. Most people apparently consider that the New Testament expresses strong opposition to homosexuality, but this simply is not the case. The six propositions that follow, considered cumulatively, direct to the conclusion that the New Testament does not provide any straightforward guidance for understanding and making judgments about homosexuality in the modern nature.

Proposition 1: Strictly speaking, the New Testament says nothing at all about homosexuality.

‍There is not a single Greek word or phrase in the entire New Testament that should be translated into English as “homosexual” or “homosexuality.” In fact, the very notion of “homosexuality”—like that of “heterosexuality,” “bisexuality,” and even “sexual orientation”—is essentially a modern concept that would simply have been unintelligible to the Fresh Testament writers. The synonyms “homosexuality” came into operate only in the latter part of the ni

Mary & George: homosexual relationships in the time of King James I were forbidden – but not uncommon

The Sky TV series Mary & George tells the story of the Countess of Buckingham, Mary Villiers (Julianne Moore), who moulded her son George (Nicholas Galitzine) to seduce King James I. She believed that, as the king’s lover, her son could become wealthy and wield power and influence.

No one identified as a “homosexual” in King James’s time (). The word was only coined in the Victorian period and sexuality was not used to construct identities as it is today.

There was also a more fluid concept of gender. Male and female bodies were seen as fundamentally the same, with sexual differences determined by the way bodily humours (fluids) flowed through them.

A man who desired sex with other men was seen as having an imbalance in his humours – and was blamed for failing to control it.

Sexual acts between men were forbidden by the church, citing passages from the the Bible. Corinthians classed the “effeminate” and “abusers of themselves with mankind” among the “unrighteous” who would not inherit the kingdom of God.

The puritan theologian William Perkins, writing in , i

The Queen James Bible?

As one can see there is no treasure at the end of this LGBT rainbow of colorful adding and subtracting from God's Word. LGBT may transform some printed words, but the Word endures forever (1 Pet ; Psa ; Isa ; Matt ; 1 Pet ; ; 2 Pet ; 1 John , 3). Perhaps instead of trying to justify their sinful conduct, the LGBT movement (and especially the editors of the QJV) should expend more time reflecting on God's eternal Word in 2 Corinthians , which says:

Therefore seeing we possess this ministry, as we have received mercy, we faint not; But possess renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God.

Only the reality [the full truth and nothing but the truth] can set one free (John ).

Leviticus

“You shall not lounge with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.”[1] It is not a surprise that this verse seems to say that homosexual male sex is forbidden in the eyes of God. The dominant view of western Christianity forbids same-sex relations. This verse is one of the clobber passages that people cite from the Bible to condemn homosexuality. This essay first looks at the various ways the verse is translated into the English Bible and then explores some of the strategies used to create an affirming meaning of what this corridor means for the LGBTQ community. More specifically, it presents the interpretation of K. Renato Lings in which Lev. refers to male-on-male incest.